Problem Space and Solution Space Practice in Design Methods in Relation to Exotelic and Autotelic Experience: A Theoretical Exploration
Problem Space and Solution Space Practice in Design Methods in Relation to Exotelic and Autotelic Experience: A Theoretical Exploration
Files (excerpt)
Published date
2016
Resource type
Publisher
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
Call no.
Other identifier(s)
Edition
Copyrighted date
Language
eng
File type
application/pdf
Extent
6 pages
Other title(s)
Authors
Advisor
Other Contributor(s)
Citation
The International Journal of Design
Management and Professional Practice 10 (3): 1-6.
Degree name
Degree level
Degree discipline
Degree department
Degree grantor
Abstract
Design methods practiced in the modern industrial era tend to override the joy of designing. As the understanding of
design as science emerged in the 1980s, prescriptive design methods have gradually replaced the descriptive design
methods traditionally practiced by designers. In response to the world’s demand for cheap products, prescriptive
design methods have also led to labor exploitation through mass production processes, which have ultimately
changed the work-life experiences of those involved. This phenomenon has resulted in an "exotelic" work-life
experience that is driven by fulfilling external goals as opposed to an "autotelic" work-life experience driven by
fulfilling self-sustaining goals. Autotelic experience is a vital component of "flow" that makes life more meaningful,
thus resulting in happier citizens and a better society. In this light, this study aims to explore the theoretical framework
of practices of "problem space" and "solution space" in "descriptive" and "prescriptive" models of design methods.
Moreover, this study seeks to determine how practices are related to levels of creativity and "flow," which is an
important factor in a model of an alternative design method focused on autotelic approaches to work, thus rendering
work-life experience more pleasant and effective.