An Effective Model for Case-Based Maintenance in Cased-Based Reasoning Systems

Published date
2015-11
Resource type
Publisher
ISBN
ISSN
DOI
Call no.
Other identifier(s)
Edition
Copyrighted date
Language
eng
File type
application/pdf
Extent
6 pages
Other title(s)
Authors
Advisor
Other Contributor(s)
Citation
1st Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences, ICIIBMS-2015, pp. 129-134. (November 28 – 30, 2015)
Degree name
Degree level
Degree discipline
Degree department
Degree grantor
Abstract
Case-based reasoning systems have been applied for machine learning, artificial intelligence, knowledge-based systems and other related fields in order to provide the right solution to the right problem regarding the four processes, which are the process to retrieve, reuse, revise, and retain cases. This paper focuses on the last process because it produces two main problems, which are the size of a case base increase and the ability of preserving the competency decreases. These critical issues are occurring when repeating the cycles of case-based reasoning. Consequently, the case-based maintenance methods are developed to handle the situations. Accordingly, this paper proposes an effective model for case-based maintenance in casebased reasoning systems to give the best results compared with random, utility, footprint, footprint and utility deletion including case addition algorithm. By running the seven comparative studies on ten datasets retrieved from the machine learning repository, especially to study the efficiency of each algorithm in terms of reducing the size of the case base by selecting the small number of case solutions and preserving the competency after the maintenance systems are applied. According to experimental results, the effectiveness of the proposed model for storing the number of case solution gives the lower size of a case base, when compared with the existing techniques about 34.34%-114.84%. Besides, the percentage of adapting solutions for the traditional methods are lower than the proposed model as about 1.12-6.64 times, including the percent solving problem is lower than the effective model approximately 4.73%-33.55%.
Table of contents
Description
punsarn.dc.description.sponsorship
Spatial Coverage
Subject(s)
Rights
Access rights
Rights holder(s)
Location
View External Resources