Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNattapat Limsiritong
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-15T02:14:47Z
dc.date.available2018-06-15T02:14:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationRSUIJCG Vol. 3 No. 1 (January - December 2016), 18-25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.au.edu/handle/6623004553/21064
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work is to answer the questions that “What is the deadlock of ASEAN Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (ASEAN DSMs)?” and “Why can’t ASEAN unlock it?” by comparative study between ASEAN DSMs and European Union Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (EU DSMs). A result of this work found that a positive consensus in decision making mode of ASEAN Summit under Article 20 of ASEAN Charter (Charter), which is seriously designed to protect the political security of ASEAN, also created a deadlock of ASEAN DSMs as a whole. Finally, in order to bypass this dead-end, the ASEAN needs to reverse the process by using the model of reverse consensus (negative consensus). However, even the Charter opens a gap to unlock its deadlock by re-interpreting of law, the ASEAN Summit still keep seriously staying on an ASEAN way to protect the political security. Hence the deadlock of ASEAN DSMs cannot be solved in practice until the political mindset of ASEAN is changed.en_US
dc.format.extent8 pagesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectASEAN DSMsen_US
dc.subjectASEAN charteren_US
dc.subjectConsensus of ASEAN summiten_US
dc.titleThe Deadlock of ASEAN Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Why ASEAN Cannot Unlock It?en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.rights.holderNattapat Limsiritongen_US
mods.genreArticleen_US
au.link.externalLink[Full Text] (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3043150)


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record