Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatsumoto, Fumihiko
dc.contributor.authorKajornpat Tangyin
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T07:46:47Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T07:46:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPrajna Vihara: The Journal of Philosophy and Religion 20, 1 (January-June 2019), 18-40en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.au.edu/handle/6623004553/22209
dc.description.abstractThis research critically investigates the soteriological ground of John Hick’s religious typology and his understanding of Religious Pluralism. It begins by considering the criticsims of Gavin D’Costa who, in his early work, favored Hick’s typology in Theology and Religious Pluralism, but later became critical of it in his work, Impossibility of a Pluralist view of Religions. It will also consider Paul Knitter’s alternative fourfold typology introduced in his work, Introducing Theologies of Religions, and Mark Heim’s ideas concerning religious pluralism in his work Salvation. Finally, the paper will investigate Zen Buddhism’s view of a “positionless position” as a “non-common denominator” from Masao Abe’s Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue to see if Hick’s idea of ultimate reality is viable basis to defend religious pluralism. After demonstrating these critiques of Hick’s main soteriological grounds of this threefold typology, the research defends a new framework of threefold typology, not built on soteriological grounds, but on teleological grounds, in order to fulfill Hick’s own wishes for promoting peace both spiritually and socially. This is a new framework which can embrace the beliefs of not only pluralists, but also exclusivists and inclusivists, and those who comprise the majority of Christians in the world today.en_US
dc.format.extent23 pagesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAssumption University Pressen_US
dc.rightsThis work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner.en_US
dc.subjectExclusivismen_US
dc.subjectInclusivismen_US
dc.subjectReligious pluralismen_US
dc.subjectUltimate realityen_US
dc.subject.otherPrajna Vihara: -- Journal of Philosophy and Religionen_US
dc.subject.otherPrajna Vihara: -- Journal of Philosophy and Religion -- 2019en_US
dc.titleA teleological interpretation of John Hick's threefold typologyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.rights.holderAssumption Universityen_US
mods.genreJournal Articleen_US
au.link.externalLink[Full Text] (http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/3932/2284)


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record