A comparative study of educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical Universit

au.link.externalLink [Full Text] (http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/Scholar/article/view/2182/1531)
dc.contributor.author Meiyu, Yu
dc.contributor.author Watana Vinitwatanakhun
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-29T03:47:35Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-29T03:47:35Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.description.abstract This study compares educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal Normal en_US
dc.description.abstract This study compares educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. The research objectives were to: (1) Identify the dominant leadership styles of the educational administrators in three types of universities in China, Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. (2) Compare the educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. (3) Compare the leadership styles of the educational administrators classified by demographic background in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. This research used the House Path-Goal Theory and related theories and models. The researcher used quantitative survey methodology to compute and analyze the research data. The dominant leadership style of educational administrators in three types of universities in China was directive leadership style. The results revealed that the educational administrators recognized their leadership styles as of high importance. It also found that there were no significant differences in the educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China. Besides, there were no significant differences in the leadership style of the educational administrators classified by demographic background in three types of universities in China. However, there was a significant difference between female educational administrators and male educational administrators under achievement-oriented leadership style in University of Science and Technology in China. en_US
dc.description.abstract This study compares educational administrators’ leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. The research objectives were to: (1) Identify the dominant leadership styles of the educational administrators in three types of universities in China, Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. (2) Compare the educational administrators’ leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. (3) Compare the leadership styles of the educational administrators classified by demographic background in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical University. This research used the House Path-Goal Theory and related theories and models. The researcher used quantitative survey methodology to compute and analyze the research data. The dominant leadership style of educational administrators in three types of universities in China was directive leadership style. The results revealed that the educational administrators recognized their leadership styles as of high importance. It also found that there were no significant differences in the educational administrators’ leadership styles in three types of universities in China. Besides, there were no significant differences in the leadership style of the educational administrators classified by demographic background in three types of universities in China. However, there was a significant difference between female educational administrators and male educational administrators under achievementoriented leadership style in University of Science and Technology in China.
dc.format.extent 14 pages en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.identifier.citation Scholar: Au Graduate School of Education Journal 8, 1 (2016), 14-27 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1906-6406
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.au.edu/handle/6623004553/17992
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Digital Production Press, Assumption University en_US
dc.rights This work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner. en_US
dc.subject Educational administrator en_US
dc.subject Leadership styles en_US
dc.subject Three types of universities in China en_US
dc.subject Normal university en_US
dc.subject University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.subject Medical University en_US
dc.subject.other Scholar: -- AU Graduate School of Education Journal
dc.subject.other Scholar: -- AU Graduate School of Education Journal -- 2016
dc.title A comparative study of educational administrators' leadership styles in three types of universities in China: Normal University, University of Science and Technology, and Medical Universit en_US
dc.type Text en_US
mods.genre Journal Article en_US
Files
Excerpt bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
scholarj-Abstract-17992.pdf
Size:
674.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Abstract